Has Copernicus Sashimi (1543.typepad.com) gone to the great Blog Kingdom in the Sky? Or moved on to a new home? Anybody know?
What You Said
- Sue Handy-Routh on A challenge
- niceguyeddie on A very, very belated post-election post
- sharon on Blogs: something for everyone…
- Chris Williams on Blogs: something for everyone…
- Matt on A short message for the day
- Brandon on A short message for the day
- Sharon on Blogs: something for everyone…
- Jonathan Dresner on Blogs: something for everyone…
-
Past Notes
- Who writes Wikipedia?
- Good Digital Things for a New Year
- Way too much fun
- Randomly noted around the web
- A very, very belated post-election post
- Recently noted around the web
- A short message for the day
- Recently noted around the web
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- ARCHIVES and Categories...
Latest Blogs
-
Other Links
-
History Carnivals News
- 2008 Cliopatria Awards for History Blogging
- New Edition: History Carnival
- CFP: History Carnival
- Genealogy and Indian History
- Posted: Military History Carnival
- Hosts needed for Carnivalesque
- Posted: History Carnival 71
- Posted: Carnivalesque (ancient/medieval)
- CFP: History Carnival
- New Editions: Genealogy, Indian, 4 Stone Hearth
-
Meta
6 comments on “Copernicus Sashimi, where art thou?”
Copernicus Sashimi is no longer
I did not have enough time to make the project what I wanted it to be. Maybe one day when things settle down a bit (always optimistic) I’ll return to blog on the history of science.
I’m really sorry to hear that. But it was nice knowing you - make sure you let us know when you make your comeback!
I too hope Copernicus Sashimi comes back! It was a very good blog and I was sorry to have to delete it from my blogroll …
I know saying ‘me too’ is dull, but I agree. I thought it was a very good starting point for looking at what’s happening in History of Science.
And it’s a fantastic name for a blog.
Add my name to the list of those who miss Copernicus Shashimi!
Sorry to sound flip, but you could make it what we want it to be? Which is what it is now, or was until the Blog Darkness fell upon the shining lights of the tiny village of itselfnesses.
I know exactly what you are talking about, but I have discovered that blogs exist apart from their makers, and can be fed irregularly and still survive. People just RSS them and they become one more strand in the great river of digital being, loved when they arrive, missed only slightly if they don’t…
There is a substantive point beneath this silliness.